Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Exactly what are common risks associated with FDI in the MENA region

Blog Article

Recent research highlights the significant role that cultural differences play within the success or of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf.

Working on adjusting to local culture is essential but not sufficient for successful integration. Integration is a loosely defined concept involving several things, such as for instance appreciating local values, comprehending decision-making styles beyond a restricted transactional business viewpoint, and looking into societal norms that influence business practices. In GCC countries, effective business affairs are more than just transactional interactions. What impacts employee motivation and job satisfaction differ significantly across countries. Thus, to truly integrate your business in the Middle East a couple of things are essential. Firstly, a corporate mind-set change in risk management beyond monetary risk management tools, as consultants and lawyers such as Salem Al Kait and Ammar Haykal in Ras Al Khaimah would probably recommend. Next, methods that can be effectively implemented on the ground to translate the new approach into practice.

Recent studies on risks linked to foreign direct investments in the MENA region offer fresh insights, attempting to bridge the gap in empirical knowledge regarding the risk perceptions and management strategies of Western multinational corporations active extensively in the area. For example, research project involving a few major worldwide businesses within the GCC countries unveiled some fascinating findings. It contended that the risks related to foreign investments are a lot more complex than just political or exchange rate risks. Cultural risks are perceived as more important than governmental, monetary, or financial dangers based on survey data . Moreover, the study found that while aspects of Arab culture strongly influence the business environment, numerous foreign organisations find it difficult to adjust to local customs and routines. This difficulty in adapting is really a danger dimension that needs further investigation and a change in how multinational corporations run in the area.

Although governmental instability seems to dominate news coverage regarding the Middle East, in recent times, the region—and particularly the Arabian Gulf—has seen a stable upsurge in international direct investment (FDI). The Middle East and Arab Gulf markets are becoming increasingly appealing for FDI. But, the present research on what multinational corporations perceive area specific risks is scarce and usually does not have depth, a fact solicitors and danger experts like Louise Flanagan in Ras Al Khaimah would likely know about. Studies on dangers related to FDI in the region have a tendency to overstate and predominantly concentrate on governmental dangers, such as for instance government instability or policy modifications which could affect investments. But lately research has begun to illuminate a crucial yet often overlooked factor, namely the consequences of cultural factors regarding the sustainability of foreign investments in the Arab Gulf. Indeed, a number of studies reveal that many businesses and their management teams significantly overlook the effect of cultural differences, mainly due to too little knowledge of these cultural factors.